BEHAVIORAL INFLUENCE CHANNELS IN EDUCATION: CONCEPTUALIZATION AND PRACTICAL POTENTIAL

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to identify and substantiate the behavioral influence channels on the population’s adoption of educational decisions, which will allow to specify the directions and content of behavioral interventions in the formation of policies and practices in education at the stage of post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. The relevance of the work is due to the increasing impact of uncertainty on educational decisions and population behavior in the conditions of a prolonged war. The methodological basis of the study is a combination of interdisciplinary, systemic, and behavioral intervention-oriented approaches; general scientific and special methods were used, including structural-logical generalization, desk-based content analysis, and system analysis.

The generalization of interdisciplinary sources of recent decades has made it possible to: outline the main advantages of the behavioral approach as a general methodological framework for taking into account the patterns of human behavior; highlight the most recognized models of behavior change in international practice; identify factors and features of human behavior that should be taken into account when determining behavioral influence channels; substantiate these channels from the standpoint of classical and behavioral economics, as well as other behavioral sciences; select examples of international practices and cases that have the potential for implementation in Ukraine within the framework of the relevant behavioral influence channels in the field of education. The novelty of the work lies in the identification of five behavioral influence channels, i.e. areas of educational behavior of the population and related educational decisions, which can be targeted by behavioral interventions: 1. Educational and professional choice (more balanced choice of educational institution, future profession, etc.); 2. Behavior in the learning process (supporting motivation, orientation towards academic success); 3. Participation in education and educational trajectory (main stages of participation in education and educational transitions); 4. Acquisition and updating of skills, competencies (formation of readiness for lifelong learning and other aspects); 5. Gender perceptions in educational and professional orientation (modernization of ideas about educational, professional and career opportunities, overcoming gender stereotypes and related self-limitations of educational and professional choice). The use of such an approach makes it possible to take into account behavioral-activity, motivational-cognitive, value-worldview and competence-adaptive aspects of educational behavior and related decisions. A logical scheme of the relationship of behavioral influence with the stages of the behavioral process is also proposed.

REFERENCES / ЛІТЕРАТУРА

1. Malmendier, Ulrike (2026). Introduction. Homo Experiens: Why Behavioral Economics Needs the Life Sciences. In: A. Samson (Ed.). The Behavioral Economics Guide 2026, VII— XVIII. https://www.behavioraleconomics.com/be-guide/

2. Haas, C., & Hadjar, A. (2020). Students’ trajectories through higher education: a review of quantitative research. High Educ, 79, 1099—1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734- 019-00458-5

3. Hofer, A., Zhivkovikj, A. & Smyth, R. (2020). The role of labour market information in guiding educational and occupational choices. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 229. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/59bbac06-en

4. Fischer, Mira (2018). Essays in Behavioral Economics of Education. Experimental and Empirical Studies on Information, Beliefs, and Educational Decisions. PhD thesis. Univer sität zu Köln. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/8117/

5. Hiriscau, A., & Pintea, M. (2024). Birth order, socioeconomic background and educational attainment. Education Economics, 32 (3), 395—412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292. 2023.2217482

6. Biddle, N. (2021). Behavioural economics and the COVID-induced education crisis. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 254. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/eba2b867-en

7. OECD (2022). Good practice principles for ethical behavioural science in public policy. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 20. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/e19a9be9-en

8. Vu, T., Magis-Weinberg, L., & Jansen, B.R.J. et al. (2022). Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda. Educ Psychol Rev, 34, 39—71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09616-7

9. Scherrer, V., Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., & Elliot, A. J. (2020). Development of achievement goals and their relation to academic interest and achievement in adolescence: A review of the literature and two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology, 56 (4), 795—814. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000898

10. Lavecchia, Adam M., Liu, Heidi, & Oreopoulos, Philip (2015, February). Behavioral Economics of Education: Progress and Possibilities. IZA DP, No. 8853. https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/8853/behavioral-economics-of-education-progress-and-possibilities

11. Levitt, Steven D., John A. List, Susanne Neckermann, & Sally, Sadoff (2016). The Behavioralist Goes to School: Leveraging Behavioral Economics to Improve Educational Performance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8 (4), 183—219. https://doi. org/10.1257/pol.20130358.

12. Koch, Alexander; Nafziger, Julia, & Nielsen, Helena Skyt (2015). Behavioral economics of education. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115 (C), 3—17. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.09.005.

13. Diamond, Abigail; Vorley, Tim; Roberts, Jennifer; & Jones, Stephen (2012). Behavioural Approaches to Understanding Student Choice. Higher Education Academy (HEA) (United Kingdom); CFE Research Ltd. (United Kingdom); National Union of Students (NUS) (United Kingdom); University of Sheffield (United Kingdom). https://s3.euwest-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/ private/resources/student_choice_1568036615.pdf

14. Rubenson, K., & Desjardins, R. (2009). The Impact of Welfare State Regimes on Barriers to Participation in Adult Education: A Bounded Agency Model: A Bounded Agency Model. Adult Education Quarterly, 59 (3), 187—207. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F07417 13609331548

15. OECD (2019). Working Better with Age, Ageing and Employment Policies. OECD Pub - l ishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/c4d4f66a-en.

16. OECD (2025). Education Policy Outlook 2025: Nurturing Engaged and Resilient Lifelong Learners in a World of Digital Transformation. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/ 10.1787/c3f402ba-en

17. Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (1), 59—77. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X503501.

18. De Paola, Maria; & Scoppa, Vincenzo (2015). Procrastination, academic success and the effectiveness of a remedial program. IZA DP No. 8021. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 115, 217—236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.007.

19. Hanushek, Eric A., Machin, Stephen, & Woessmann, Ludger (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of the Economics of Education, 5. Elsevier B.V. https://oreopoulos.faculty.economics. utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/lavecchia-liu-and-oreopoulos-behavioraleconomics-of-education-handbook-chapter-2016.pdf

20. Miller, S., Davison, J., Yohanis, J., Sloan, S., Gildea, A., & Thurston. A. (2017). Texting parents: Evaluation report and executive summary. https://eric.ed.gov/

21. Bergman, Peter (2019). How behavioral science can empower parents to improve children’s educational outcomes. Behavioral Science & Policy, 5 (1), 53—67. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 237946151900500105

22. OECD (2025). Advancing Adult Skills through Individual Learning Accounts: A Step-byStep Guide for Policymakers. Getting Skills Right. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi. org/10.1787/08e1bdaf-en

23. Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science: IS, 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42

24. Michie, S., Atkins, L., & West, R. (2014). The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions. Silverback Publishing

25. Ionkova, Kremena M.; Tomio, Andrea Ailin; Roy, Emma De; Yadav, Sonakshi; Kaza, Silpa; & Karver, Jonathan George et al. (2024). Behavior Change in Solid Waste Management — A Compendium of Cases (English). eMBeD Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099091423124016666

26. MINDSPACE (2010). Influencing behaviour through public policy. Handbook. UK Institute for Government. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/ publications/MINDSPACE.pdf